AMTA Paper Archive


Welcome to the AMTA paper archive. Select a category, publication date or search by author.

(Note: Papers will always be listed by categories.  To see ALL of the papers meeting your search criteria select the "AMTA Paper Archive" category after performing your search.)


Search AMTA Paper Archive
    
    




Sort By:  Date Added   Publication Date   Title   Author

RCS

Concurrent RCS measurements
M.C. Li (Naval Research Laboratory), November 1991

The radar cross section (RCS) of a target depends on nature environment as well as many physical variables. The objective of a compact range is to exclude environmental effects on RCS measurements of a target. It is also true for time gated RCS measurements as well. RCS obtained in above manners is more suitable for a space borne than for a ground based target. The contribution from surrounding environment is an inseparable part of RCS for a ship, truck, bridge, and building. We need a suitable method to characterize RCS of a ground based target and its dependence on the environment. The uncontrollable natural change makes environmentally dependent RCS results difficult to compare for a ground based target measured at different time instants. A way to reduce the uncertainties induced from changes is to exhaust all possible RCS measurements before the change. A measurement of this kind is referred to as a concurrent RCS measurement, which in a sense is equivalent to take an optical picture of a rapidly changing object with a strobe light. The step frequency radar located at Chesapeake Bay Detachment of Naval Research Laboratory is such a radar, which is equivalent to at least 45 single frequency radars operating simultaneously from 2.0-18.0 Ghz. Last year, we briefly mentioned this radar in our presentation. We will make a detail discussion of this radar and its capability on concurrent RCS measurements.

Some differences between gated CW and pulse radars in RCS and imaging measurements
R.H. Bryan (Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.), November 1991

This paper compare some of the features and capabilities of gated CW and pulse radars for RCS and imaging measurements. At the conceptual level, these two types of radars are very similar. The primary conceptual difference is that a pulse radar has a relatively high bandwidth receiver while a gated CW system has a relatively narrow bandwidth receiver. The measures of performance of an RCS and imaging system include sensitivity, measurement time, clutter rejection, dynamic range and accuracy. Other considerations such as inter-pulse modulation may be important in some cases. For some applications, typically where long ranges are involved, a pulse system has significant performance advantages. For many applications, the performance advantage of a pulse system is not significant, particularly when viewed in light of the large difference in cost. This is particularly true of Quality Assurance applications which are normally characterized by both short range and lower budgets. Typically, the price of a gated CW system is in the range of ¼ to ½ the price of a comparable pulse system. This paper discusses general similarities and differences in the fundamental operating characteristics of the two systems. Specific performance measures are discussed including system sensitivity, gate performance, clutter rejection, and measurement times. Other considerations such as pulse modulation are discussed. A summary of the various considerations is presented in order to give the reader an understanding of the applications for which a gated CW system is more appropriate.

A New calibration technique for bistatic RCS measurements
K. Schmitt (Institut fur Hochstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik),E. Heidrich (Institut fur Hochstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik) W. Wiesbeck (Institut fur Hochstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik), November 1991

A bistatic calibration technique for wide-band, full-polarimetric instrumentation radars is presented in this paper. First general bistatic measurement problems are discussed, as there are the coordinate systems, the definition of polarization and the bistatic scattering behavior of convenient calibration targets. In chapter two the new calibration approach is presented. The general mathematical and physical description of errors introduced in the bistatic system is based on the radiation transfer matrix. The calibration procedure is discussed for the application with a vector network analyzer based instrumentation radar. For verification purposes measurements were performed on several targets.

Radar cross section measurements for computer code validation
S. Mishra (Canadian Space Agency),C. Larose (Canadian Space Agency) C.W. Trueman (Concordia University), November 1991

Computer codes for the computation of scattering are based on physical, mathematical, and numerical assumptions and approximations that impact the accuracy of the results in ways that are not obvious or quantifiable analytically. This paper stresses the usefulness of a concurrent measurement program to provide reliable RCS data for targets of special interest in establishing the range of validity of the various assumptions upon which a specific computer code is based. This in turn assists in developing “modelling guidelines” restricting the design of computer models for input to the code such that reasonable accurate results are likely to be obtained.

Surface wave radar cross section measurements
S. Mishra (Canadian Space Agency),C. Larose (Canadian Space Agency) C.W. Trueman (Concordia University) T. M. Coyne (Defence Research Establishment), November 1991

Two measurement systems for Radar Cross Section (RCS) measurements are described. One system employs propagation over a ground plane whereas the other system employs free space propagation in an anechoic chamber for target illumination. A comparison of measured data for different targets over a wide range of frequencies is presented. The measured data is also compared to RCS data computed using the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC) computer program. The results may be useful for evaluating radar systems operating in the HF band of frequencies.

Doppler and MTI radar cross-section simulation, measurement, and analysis of rotating bodies and bodies in motion
J., III Pantalone (Norden Systems, Inc.), November 1991

This paper considers the radar cross-section (RCS) simulation, measurement, and analysis of rotating structures found in today’s modern airframes. Addressed will be scattering characteristics from helicopter main and tail rotor systems; how these characteristics can be simulated, measured, and reduced to identify the individual scatterers withing the helicopter. The effect of radar system parameters on the scattered signal will also be discussed. Finally, actual RCS measurements from helicopters in flight wil be resented and analyzed using the above discussed techniques.

Microwave absorber performance analyses from PMM calculations and RCS measurements
C.F. Yang (The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory),R.C. Rudduck (The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory), W.D. Burnside (The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory), November 1991

Recently, the theory and computer programs on the Periodic Moment Method (PMM) for scattering from both singly and doubly periodic arrays of lossy dielectric bodies have been developed. The purpose is to design microwave wedge and pyramid absorber for low reflectivity so that one can improve measurements and/or reduce the size of the anechoic chamber. With PMM, the reflection and transmission coefficients of periodically distributed bodies illuminated by a plane wave have been accurately calculated on the Cray Y-MP supercomputer at the Ohio Supercomputer Center. Through these studies, some wedge and pyramid absorber configurations have been designed, fabricated and tested in the OSU/ESL Anechoic Chamber. Very good agreement between calculations and measurements has been obtained. In the 1990 AMTA meeting, several wedge absorber designs and results for the TM case and normal incidence were presented. In this paper, the measured and calculated frequency responses of some experimental wedge designs, as well as an 8” and 18” commercial wedge and pyramid absorber panels will be reported for both TM and TE polarizations. Time domain responses will also be shown for both measurements and calculations.

Low-RCS structural laminate materials for scattering measurements
D.G. Watters (SRI International),R.J. Vidmar (SRI International), November 1991

A three-layer sandwich structure consisting of a plastic film-to-foam lamination is presented as a low-RCS alternative to structural foam. Structural foam with 1-2 lb/ft density is commonly used as a low-RCS material. However, its RCS per unit load per unit volume is not as low as that of a composite foam structure. Equations relating mechanical strength and RCS are simultaneously solved for maximum mechanical strength and minimum RCS in the limit of Rayleigh and resonance region material thicknesses. A result is that a three-layer foam sandwich beam can have superior mechanical strength compared with an identical all-foam beam and a reduced RCS. Specific results for an optimized sandwich with mechanical strength equal to that of a homogenous beam and minimum RCS are presented. Experimental data quantify mechanical strength and RCS for several foam-mylar sandwiches.

Range instrumentation performance verification and traceability
D. Lynch (Hewlett-Packard Company), November 1991

This paper will discuss the need for performance verification, or calibration, of the transmitter and receiver systems used in an antenna or RCS range. Errors introduced by the range and positioning system means the instrumentation’s performance must be measured independently of the range and positioner. The performance verification should insure that the measurement system exceeds the manufactures’ specifications by a reasonable margin. The verification must be performed with the equipment installed on the range to insure adequate performance on the range. The system must als be verified as a system, rather than individual instruments. This guarantees that measurement errors in each instrument will not add together to exceed the system’s specifications. Testing of the system should be easy and repeatable to insure accuracy of the verification by the test technician. The tests should also be documented for later reference. The measurements should be traceable to a local standard such as NIST to certify the accuracy and stability of the measurement. The verification should be repeated on a regular basis to insure continued accuracy of the measurement system.

Error budget performance analysis for compact radar range
M. Arm (Riverside Research Institute),L. Wolk (Riverside Research Institute), R. Reichmeider (Riverside Research Institute), November 1991

The target designer using a compact range to verify the predicted RCS of his target needs to know what measurement errors are introduced by the range. The underlying definition of RCS assumes that the target is in the far-field, in free-space, and illuminated by a plane wave. This condition is approximated in a compact range. However, to the extent that these conditions are not met, the RCS measurement is in error. This paper, using the results of the preceding companion paper1, formulates an error budget which shows the typical sources that contribute to the RCS measurement error in a compact range. The error sources are separated into two categories, according to whether they depend on the target or not. Receiver noise is an example of a target independent error source, as are calibration errors, feed reverberation (“ringdown”), target support scattering and chamber clutter which arrives within the target range gate. The target dependent error sources include quiet zone ripple, cross polarization components, and multipath which correspond to reflections of stray non-collimated energy from the target which arrives at the receiver at the same time as the desired target return. These error contributors depend on the manner in which the target interacts with the total quiet zone-field, and the bistatic RCS which the target may present to any off-axis illumination. Results presented in this paper are based on the design of a small compact range which is under construction at RRI. The results include a comprehensive error budget and an assessment of the range performance.

Compact range performance
M. Arm (Riverside Research Institute),L. Wolk (Riverside Research Institute), M. Rochwarger (Riverside Research Institute), N. Erlbach (Riverside Research Institute), R. Reichmeider (Riverside Research Institute), November 1991

A performance simulation for analyzing the measurements of target RCS in a compact radar range has been applied to a small indoor range which will be installed at RRI. A dual reflector collimator has been examined with respect to both quiet-zone quality and the amount of stray energy in the chamber which eventually end up as clutter or multipath interference. The complicated ray geometries, beyond the reach of hand calculation, are discovered by complete tracing of all the rays from the feed source. The ray pats which interfere with target measurements are shown convincingly by graphical display. Vector clutter subtraction is widely used in compact ranges in order to reduce the background clutter to an acceptable level. Some of the effects which limit the effectiveness of clutter subtraction are also addressed in the paper. The sources of measurement errors which are obtained by this simulation are used in the measurement-error budget analysis, which is the subject of the follow-on paper.

A Novel, bistatic, fully polarimetric radar cross-section measurement facility
A.J. Blanchard (Space Technology and Research Center),B.A. Williams (Space Technology and Research Center), B.D. Jersak (Space Technology and Research Center), B.D. Krenek (Space Technology and Research Center), J.K. Glazner (Space Technology and Research Center), R.F. Schindel (Space Technology and Research Center), W.N. Colquitt (Space Technology and Research Center), November 1991

A new radar cross-section (RCS) measurement facility has been designed and built at the Houston Advanced Research Center in Houston, Texas. This facility is capable of performing fully polarimetric RCS measurements over a frequency bandwidth of 2-40 GHz ad nearly an entire hemisphere of bistatic angles. What makes this facility unique is the fact that both the transmit and receive antennas are mounted on moveable platforms. The transmit antenna is fixed at 0º azimuth, but can be positioned anywhere from 10º to approximately 165º in elevation. The receive antenna can be positioned anywhere from 0º to 180º in azimuth and the same range in elevation as the transmit antenna. Monostatic measurements can be approximated by moving the transmit and receive antennas close together. The radar equipment is built around the HP 8510 vector network analyzer, and the measurement process is controlled and automated by an HP UNIX workstation running HP’s Visual Engineering Environment software.

Quiet zone scan of the single-plane collimating range
C.R. Birtcher (Arizona State University),C.A. Balanis (Arizona State University), V.J. Vokurka (Eindhoven University), November 1991

The prototype of the March Microwave Single-Plane Collimating Range (SPCR) has been in operation at Arizona State University’s ElectroMagnetic Anechoic Chamber (EMAC) facility for approximately three years. The unique SPCR produces a cylindrical-wave test region by bouncing spherical wavefronts off a parabolic cylindrical reflector. Consequently, a simplified algorithm can be applied to determine antenna far-field patterns. Both computation and acquisition times can be reduced considerably when compared to classical NF/FF cylindrical scanning techniques. To date, this is the only SPCR in operation. Some of the fundamental quantities which characterize an antenna/RCS measurement range are the size and quality of the “quiet zone”, usually expressed in terms of ripple and taper of the illuminating fields relative to an ideal planar wavefront. Direct one-way probing of the quiet zone fields in the vertical and horizontal planes has been recently completed at ASU. An overview of the range geometry, the field probing methodology, and the data processing will be presented. The results of the quiet zone scan will be presented as amplitude ripple, amplitude taper, and phase ripple versus frequency from 4 GHz to 18 GHz in four bands. The vertical-scan phase deviations are relative to an ideal planar wavefront, while those of the horizontal scan are relative to an ideal cylindrical wavefront.

An Advanced on-line RCS data analysis sytem using a Tektronix XD-88 superworkstation
D. Yanke (McDonnell Douglas Technologies Incorporated), November 1991

Advanced Radar Cross Section (RCS) Data Analysis, consisting of comparisons of measured RCS data to predictions, multiple plot overlays, imaging, etc., it is most often performed off-line. This causes a lag in data acquisition time by as much as several days. McDonnell Douglas Technologies Incorporated’s (MDTI) Radar Measurement Center, a large target (40 feet) indoor RCS measurement facility, used an advanced RCS data analysis system, based on a Tektronix XD-88 superworkstation, for on-line data processing. This system connects over a Local Area Network to the data acquisition computer. This allows the workstation access to each data file immediately after each measurement for processing, without affecting the data acquisition capabilities of the radar system. The hardware used for connections, capabilities of the MDTI-written software, and the capability to store plotted data on VHS videotape directly from the workstation, is described herein.

Performance comparison of different configurations of compact ranges for antennas and RCS measurements
P.L. Garcia-Muller (IRSA),C. Abella (IRSA), M. Marin (IRSA), November 1991

In the present work, different configurations of reflector systems for indoor antenna and RCS measurements have been studied and compared. These include the Single Offset reflector, Dual Parabolic Cylinder configuration, Shaped Cassegrain, Front-fed Cassegrain and Dual Chamber Gregorian. The above comparison between the different systems is made in terms of: Configuration efficiency; Cross Polar level introduced by the reflector configuration; Scanning capability; ratio of the configuration equivalent focal length to main reflector aperture diameter and ratio of subreflector area to main reflector area; RCS background levels; phase errors due to reflectors surface roughness as a function of the frequency. In order to illustrate the above discussion, several examples of commercially available compact ranges (S.A., March, Harris) are examined, as well as some recently developed European facilities (MBB, ESTEC, RYMSA). As it will be shown, each configuration is best suited to satisfy different user requirements. For example Shaped Cassegrain/Gregorian configurations seem to be the most efficient for RCS measurements whereas the Front-fed Cassegrain quiet zone can be scanned with low degradation.

Application of RCS antenna measurements to multiport antennas
E. Heidrich (Institut fur Hochstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik),W. Wiesbeck (Institut fur Hochstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik), November 1991

New results of wideband polarimetric radar-cross-section-(RCS-) antenna measurements are presented. A special antenna network description including polarization information and multiport feeding offers new insight in antenna behavior. The procedure omits the utilization of a standard gain antenna for absolute gain determination and no RF-feedline is necessary to the antenna under test. Antenna radiation, scattering and feed characteristics are all obtained with one measurement setup. Theory as well as measurements on different dual-polarized antenna types demonstrate the efficiency and uniqueness of this technique.

The New compact test range at Dornier, Friedrichshafen
M. Boumans (Dornier GmbH), November 1991

The new Compact Test Range at Dornier GmbH, operational since early 1990, is presented. The system is designed for both antenna and RCS measurements, for support of in-house projects as well as for third party measurement needs. Great emphasis has been on improving measurement through put to reduce effective measurement costs. The major system components are evaluated (anechoic chamber, compact range reflector system, RF instrumentation, positioner system, computer system and measurement software). System specifications, and where possible measured performance data are presented. Finally a typical antenna and RCS measurement are described to get an idea of possibilities together with required range time.

Radar-cross-section measurement errors caused by test objects interaction with low-dielectric-constant supports
B.C. Brock (Sandia National Laboratories),D.H. Zittel (Sandia National Laboratories), K.W. Sorensen (Sandia National Laboratories), W.E. Patitz (Sandia National Laboratories), November 1991

In the search for an ideal test-object support for simulate free-space radar-cross-section (RCS) measurements, low-density polystyrene foam has achieved considerable popularity. However, significant error can be introduced into a measurement by the use of an inappropriately designed support. Although low back-scatter radar cross section (RCS) can be obtained with this material, interactions can occur between the test object and the mount which will cause measurement errors in excess of several dB. We present results of measurements performed on a simple test object supported on a low-density foam column which demonstrate this effect. As we discuss, this error can be incorrectly interpreted to be caused by poor alignment of the test object with the radar-range coordinate system. Finally, we show that the errors can be explained by differential propagation effects. In addition, this simple theory provides the insight necessary to devise appropriate measures to minimize the errors cause by the presence of the support.

RCS target support background determination using translating test body
D.P. Morgan (McDonnell Douglas Technologies Incorporated), November 1991

When attempting to make accurate Radar Cross Section (RCS) measurements, it is vital to understand the background levels of both the range and the target support fixture. Typically these support fixtures are either foam columns or metal pylons. Determining the RCS levels of the metal pylons requires the installation of a termination device to hide the rotator which has a significantly lower RCS than the pylon being measured. Quite often this is an impossible task, especially at lower frequencies. An algorithm that accurately determines the pylon background levels independent of the RCS contribution of the pylon terminator is presented. This algorithm requires translating the terminator linearly and isolating the background from the resulting interference pattern. Data is included that validates the implementing computer code.

Evaluation of edge interaction errors on a component RCS test body
S. Brumley (Demnar Inc.),Patricia A Henry (Motorola GEG) Joseph P. Kobus (Motorola GEG), November 1991

Errors due to the interaction between test body and the Device Under Test are often overlooked in test body design. Interactions which cannot be gated or subtracted can be present even in low RCS test bodies. This paper presents an approach to evaluate the edge interaction errors of a component RCS test body. In order to quantify the interactions, small cylinders were attached to the face of the test body and measured from grazing to 50 degrees. The scattering of the cylinders illuminated the edges so that the interactions could be measured. This data is presented along with the results of several computer models which were used to determine the interactions involved. A method of moments model of the cylinders on an infinite ground plane gave the theoretical level of the cylinders. A pattern of a monopole antenna on a test body shaped ground plane was used to determine the contribution of each edge; and a point source model was used to locate the points on the edge where the diffraction occurred. This technique allows the dominant source of error signals to be identified.







help@amta.org
2025 Antenna Measurement Techniques Association. All Rights Reserved.
AMTA115x115Logo.png
 
 

CONNECT WITH US


Calendar

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31