Welcome to the AMTA paper archive. Select a category, publication date or search by author.
(Note: Papers will always be listed by categories. To see ALL of the papers meeting your search criteria select the "AMTA Paper Archive" category after performing your search.)
A recently developed analytic technique that can correct for probe position errors in planar near-field measurements to arbitrary accuracy [1] is shown to be also applicable to spherical near-field data after appropriate modifications. The method has been used to successfully remove errors in the near-field, hence leading to more accurate far-field patterns, even if the maximum error in the probe’s position is as large as 0.2?. Only the error-contaminated near-field measurements and an accurate probe position error function are needed to be able to implement the correction technique. It is assumed that the probe position error function is a characteristic of the near-field range, and that it has been obtained using state-of-the-art laser positioning and precision optical systems. The method also requires the ability to obtain derivatives of the error contaminated near-field defined on an error-free regular grid with respect to the coordinates. In planar geometry the derivatives are obtained using FFTs [1], and, in spherical geometry, one needs to compute derivatives of Hankel functions for radical errors, and derivatives of the spherical electric and magnetic vector basis functions for errors in the ? and Ø coordinates. The error-correction technique has been shown to work well for errors in and of the spherical coordinates r, ? or Ø. Efficient computer codes have been developed to demonstrate the technique using computer simulations.
Phase relationships between the three dominant modes on a four armed spiral can be used to perform broad band, direction of arrival estimates, but this requires accurate estimates of the phase behavior of the antenna both in the design stage and for calibration purposes. Unfortunately, imperfections in range design make the measurement and interpretation of phase information extremely difficult. This paper describes an approach where the imperfections of the range and the behavior of the antenna are modelled, and range effects removed from antenna data through antenna motion, and frequency change. This technique obtained tremendous accuracy at the cost of large amounts of data processing.
Measurements in the compact range system are susceptible to errors. Some of these errors are caused by chamber stray signals illuminating the target such as sidewall, backwall, ceiling and floor scattering. One of the major source of these stray signals is the feed spillover or the feed/subreflector spillover in a dual reflector system where the feed/subreflector is not isolated from the main chamber. Due to the limited chamber size, some of these errors cannot be eliminated by either hardware gating or software processing. An alternative approach to reduce these errors is by use of a feed cover such that the spillover field is highly attenuated before it can reach the target or chamber clutter sources. The feasibility of using feed cover in a compact range system to reduce the feed spillover has been studied in this paper. The effectiveness and problems associated with using a feed cover have been investigated in terms of numerical simulation and experimental measurements.
The Antenna Metrology Group of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently developed and implemented measurement procedures to diagnose faults on a flat phased-array antenna. First, the antenna was measured on the NISTplanar near-field (PNF) range, taking measurements on a plane where the multiple reflections between the probe and the antenna under test are minimized. This is important since the PNF method does not directly allow for these reflections. Then, the NIST PNF software which incorporates the fast Fourier transform (FFT) was used to determine the antenna’s gain and pattern and to evaluate the antenna’s performance. Next, the inverse FFT was used to calculate the fields at the aperture lane. By using this technique, errors in the aperture fields due to multiple reflections can be avoided. By analyzing this aperture plane data through the use of detailed amplitude and phase contour plots, faults in the antenna were located and corrected. The PNF theory and utilization of the inverse FFT will briefly be discussed and results shown.
This paper describes the nature of the errors introduced by amplitude and phase corruptions in the detection process of a classical quadrature mixer and a means for on-line hardware correction of those errors. The discussion defines the nature of the signal corruption produced by first order circularity errors, describes the hardware correction technique, and presents test results that demonstrate the effectiveness of the technique. The method had to meet the requirements for high precision and high speed sampling. The configuration described provides the correction with direct digital processing at the output of the in-phase and quadrature analog-to-digital converters on a pulse-by-pulse basis. The processor operates to pulse rates greater than 3 MHz and has demonstrated corrections with residual errors of approximately 0.01 dB.
In the present work, different configurations of reflector systems for indoor antenna and RCS measurements have been studied and compared. These include the Single Offset reflector, Dual Parabolic Cylinder configuration, Shaped Cassegrain, Front-fed Cassegrain and Dual Chamber Gregorian. The above comparison between the different systems is made in terms of: Configuration efficiency; Cross Polar level introduced by the reflector configuration; Scanning capability; ratio of the configuration equivalent focal length to main reflector aperture diameter and ratio of subreflector area to main reflector area; RCS background levels; phase errors due to reflectors surface roughness as a function of the frequency. In order to illustrate the above discussion, several examples of commercially available compact ranges (S.A., March, Harris) are examined, as well as some recently developed European facilities (MBB, ESTEC, RYMSA). As it will be shown, each configuration is best suited to satisfy different user requirements. For example Shaped Cassegrain/Gregorian configurations seem to be the most efficient for RCS measurements whereas the Front-fed Cassegrain quiet zone can be scanned with low degradation.
Accurate scattering and antenna measurements require excellent plane wave purity in the target zone; however all measurement systems are contaminated by various stray signals which result in measurement errors. In this paper, a technique of evaluating the stray signal sources in a compact range using a diagonal plat plate as a test target is presented. The scattering cross section of the diagonal flat plate as a function of frequency and angle of rotation is first measured. Then the time domain response for each projection angle is processed to obtain a two dimensional ISAR image of the plate as well as the stray signals. From the stray signal images, the location and relative strength of the stray signals can be determined. Experimental results from the OSU/ESL Compact Range Facility are presented to demonstrate this stray signal imaging technique.
Problems exist with the measurement of large aperture antennas due to the far field requirement. This paper discussed a new method to measure a phased array at about 1/10 the normal far field. The basic idea involves focusing the test array at probe antenna a distance R away from the aperture. In the described measurement technique the probe antenna is placed on an arm that rotates 100º on the focal arc given by Rcos(?). This arc minimizes defocusing due to phase aberrations. To minimize the amplitude errors, the pattern of the probe antenna is carefully matched in order to compensate for the 1/R variation induced amplitude error. The application of this technique will enable arrays to be measured in anechoic chambers, allowing convenient classified testing, while avoiding the effects of weather, and will reduce the risks inherent in the high power testing on transmit. The results of a computer simulation is presented that characterizes the validity and limitations of the technique.
In the search for an ideal test-object support for simulate free-space radar-cross-section (RCS) measurements, low-density polystyrene foam has achieved considerable popularity. However, significant error can be introduced into a measurement by the use of an inappropriately designed support. Although low back-scatter radar cross section (RCS) can be obtained with this material, interactions can occur between the test object and the mount which will cause measurement errors in excess of several dB. We present results of measurements performed on a simple test object supported on a low-density foam column which demonstrate this effect. As we discuss, this error can be incorrectly interpreted to be caused by poor alignment of the test object with the radar-range coordinate system. Finally, we show that the errors can be explained by differential propagation effects. In addition, this simple theory provides the insight necessary to devise appropriate measures to minimize the errors cause by the presence of the support.
Errors due to the interaction between test body and the Device Under Test are often overlooked in test body design. Interactions which cannot be gated or subtracted can be present even in low RCS test bodies. This paper presents an approach to evaluate the edge interaction errors of a component RCS test body. In order to quantify the interactions, small cylinders were attached to the face of the test body and measured from grazing to 50 degrees. The scattering of the cylinders illuminated the edges so that the interactions could be measured. This data is presented along with the results of several computer models which were used to determine the interactions involved. A method of moments model of the cylinders on an infinite ground plane gave the theoretical level of the cylinders. A pattern of a monopole antenna on a test body shaped ground plane was used to determine the contribution of each edge; and a point source model was used to locate the points on the edge where the diffraction occurred. This technique allows the dominant source of error signals to be identified.
A novel low-cost automatic system is described to measure both the complex permittivity and permeability of solid materials at 2 to 18 GHz. It is particularly useful for evaluating the frequency dependence of radar absorbing materials (RAM). The RF and the mechanical setups are described, including the computer algorithm and the measurement procedure. The results and the experimental errors of three materials are presented, which agree with results that were obtained by other methods, while the cost of putting up the system is considerably lower than any comparable alternative.
The scanning-probe spherical near-field system at GE Aerospace uses a roll over azimuth positioner with probe horn on a cantilevered arm to scan spherical sector centered over a stationary antenna. The main sources of measurement errors in this system are: 1. Signal drift, 2. Deviations of recorded angles from commanded values, 3. Differences of actual sample positions from ideal ones. Unless corrected, these arrors may alter the transformed field.
In-phase and quadrature (I/Q) aberrations in radar receiver data create problems in radars used for radar cross section (RCS) measurements. I/Q errors cause incorrect representations of the target under test. A method for correcting I/Q error and calibrating the measured amplitude to a scattering standard provides a means of obtaining a more accurate representation of the target under test. The RCS measurement instrumentation addressed here uses a wide band receiver with a single quadrature mixer for conversion of radio frequency (RF) to base band (also referred to as video) frequency. In the one-step down conversion, distortions in the I/Q constellation occur, causing I/Q errors. This method quantifies the extent of the I/Q problem by estimating the actual I/Q error from a series of calibration measurements. An algorithm is presented which quantifies parameters of the I/Q distortion, then uses the distortion parameters to remove the I/Q aberrations from the target measurement.
The effects of non-systematic receiver instrumentation errors on precision antenna measurements are investigated. A simple uncertainty model relating dynamic range to random perturbation effects on amplitude measurements is proposed. Examples of measurement uncertainty versus both input level and measurement speed are presented using data taken on modern measurement receivers. Dara are compared with the model to estimate measurement uncertainty at various pattern levels and acquisition speeds. Equivalent dynamic range specifications are deduced from the measures data.
This paper reports on a study undertaken to assess the effects of range amplitude tapers on the measurement of low and ultra-low sidelobe levels and gain. It has been shown that low test zone phase tapers are required for the measurement of low and ultra-low sidelobe levels. A few papers have addressed the effect of amplitude errors but not for the measurement of low sidelobe levels. These papers have concluded that amplitude errors have much less effect than phase errors. This paper addresses antenna measurement ranges such as compact ranges where phase taper has been significantly reduced, but amplitude errors remain. The amplitude taper on some modern compact range configurations has not only, not significantly improved, it has often taken on a more complicated “double hump” shape. The effects of these modern amplitude tapers are demonstrated.
Compact range systems have been widely used for high quality RCS measurements. However the taper and cross-polarization effects can lead to significant measurement errors especially as the target approaches the border of the target zone. The taper error is mainly caused by the feed’s finite beamwidth, and the cross-polarization error by the feed’s cross-polarized radiation and the offset configuration of the reflector. A method to correct these errors is presented. In order to perform taper and cross-polarization error corrections, one has to be able to predict the target zone fields and determine the locations and complex strengths of the various scattering centers associated with the target. The correction can then be done by compensating for the taper and cross-polarization effects for each localized scattering center. Several measurements have been taken, corrected and then compared with the theoretically expected results to validate this technique.
The reflective properties of a flat circular plate and a long thin wire are discussed in connection with the quality and calibration of the quiet zone (QZ) of a compact antenna test range. (CATR). The flat plate has several applications in the CATR. The first is simple pattern analysis, which indicated errors as function of angle in the QZ, the second uses the plate as a standard gain device. The third application makes use of the narrow reflected beam of the plate to determine the direction of the incident field. The vertical wire has been used to calibrate the direction of the polarization vector. The setup of an optical reference with a theodolite and a porro prism in relation to the propagation direction of the incident field is presented as well.
The near field technique has grown from experimental systems of the early 1960s to sophisticated accepted means of testing antennas. Several schemes have been employed, namely planar, cylindrical and spherical scanning. The spherical scanning system chosen for one of the near field ranges at GE Aerospace is different from most near field systems in that the test antenna remains stationary while the probe is made to scan over a surface of an imaginary sphere surrounding it. The sampled field is corrected for positional, phase and amplitude errors and transformed to the far field. Radiation patterns, gain, EIRP, group delay and amplitude response were measured for a shaped beam communications antenna.
Effects of probe position errors in planar near-field measurements have been significantly reduced at NIST by accurate alignment of the scanner and an analytic error correction. Currently, the near-field range has probe position errors greater than 0.01cm only at the edges of the 4 x 4 m2 area, and less than that everywhere else. The position errors can be further removed by a theoretical procedure, which requires only the error-contaminated near-field and the probe position errors at the points of measurements. All necessary computations can be efficiently performed using FFTs. An explicit nth-order approximation to the ideal near field of the antenna can be shown to converge to the error-free near fied. Computer simulations with eriodic error functions show that this error-correction technique is highly successful even if the errors are as large as 0.2wavelength, thereby making near-field measurements at frequencies will abobe 60 GHz more practicable.
Antenna engineers recognize that the planar near-field method for calibrating antennas provide accurate pattern and gain measurements. Bothe the pattern and gain measurements require some degree of probe position accuracy in order to achieve accurate results. This degree of accuracy increases for antennas that have structured near-field patterns. These are antennas in which the amplitude and phase change rapidly over a very small position change in the near-field scan plane. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently measured an antenna with a very structured near-field pattern. This measurement was performed using a new probe positioning system developed at NIST. This measurement will be discussed and results will be presented showing how slight probe position errors alter the antenna pattern and gain.