Welcome to the AMTA paper archive. Select a category, publication date or search by author.
(Note: Papers will always be listed by categories. To see ALL of the papers meeting your search criteria select the "AMTA Paper Archive" category after performing your search.)
A stressed-skin inflatable target support provides an improvement over a foam column for radar cross section (RCS) measurements in an anechoic chamber. Theoretical analysis indicates that backscatter from the support is minimized because its mass is reduced below that of a foam column and is distributed to favor incoherent scattering. Compared with a foam column, a pressurized thin shell has superior mechanical stability under both axial and transverse loads. Experimental observations using Mylar -- a low dielectric constant, high tensile strength film -- confirm these results. Spurious reflections from rotational machinery located below an inflatable column are reduced by a layer of absorber within the base of the inflatable support.
The requirement to measure lower radar cross-section (RCS) levels within anechoic chambers has demonstrated the need to further analyze the performance of microwave absorbers. The interactions of the feed system, compact range reflector, target mount, and target/test body with the microwave absorber greatly effect both the measurement accuracy and ambient noise level within the anechoic chamber. Better absorber characterization and understanding leads to improved chamber performance analysis and chamber design modeling. Past absorber studies have evaluated the backscatter performance of most absorber types, however, bistatic performance characterizations have been limited. This paper will discuss a method of obtaining bistatic absorber data which offers the advantages of time gating and synthetic aperture imaging to improve measurement isolation and accuracy. The approach involves illuminating a large absorber test wall about several incidence angles with the plane wave generated by a compact range. A receive antenna is then moved about the test wall and bistatic scattering is observed. The technique provides improved measurement results over methods utilizing NRL arch type systems. Bistatic absorber data has been collected and analyzed over angles from normal to near grazing incidence. Test results will be demonstrated with different absorber shapes, sizes, orientations, and material transitions from wedge to pyramidal. Various bistatic conditions will be analyzed for both polarizations over a number of frequencies.
Evaluation methods for analyzing the performance of anechoic chambers have typically been limited to field probing, free space VSWR and pattern comparison techniques. These methods usually allow the users of such chambers to qualify or determine the amount of measurement accuracy achievable for a given test configuration. However, these methods in general do not allow the user to easily identify the reasons for limited or degraded performance. This paper presents a method based on synthetic aperture imagery which has been found usable for finding and identifying anechoic chamber performance problems. Photographs and illustrations of a working SAR imaging/mapping system are shown. Discussions are also given regarding the method's advantages and disadvantages, system requirements and limitations, focusing processing requirements, calibration techniques, and hardware setups. Both monostatic and bistatic configurations are considered and both RCS and antenna applications are discussed. The SAR system constructed to date makes use of a portable HP-8510 based radar placed on a hydraulic manlift for easy system maneuverability and flexibility. The radar antenna is mounted on an 8 foot mechanical scanner directed toward the area to be mapped. An image is processed after each scan of the receive antenna. Measured data and example results obtained using the mapping system are presented which demonstrate the system's capabilities.
Three test methods have been developed and validated for characterizing materials at VHF and UHF in an indoor environment. The first method employs a resonant strip-line cavity for the independent determination of permittivity and permeability from .15-2 GHz. The planar field geometry and sample configuration permit evaluation of material anistropy. Measurements are taken on an Automatic Network Analyzer (HP 8510 ANA). The second method measures the reflection/transmission (R/T) of planar material samples at UHF. This is a free space measurement performed in an anechoic chamber. Data is taken from .2-2 GHz using two dual ridged horn antennas and the ANA. A calibration method has been developed for the ANA to correct for measurement errors. Off-set shorts and thru delays are used in this technique. The third technique evaluates reflection performance of materials from 150-250 MHz. This technique employs a custom designed corner reflector antenna. Only one such antenna is needed due to the calibration technique. These methods allow a synergistic approach to material development. Candidate material can be evaluated using the cavity or R/T systems. Material designs can then be tested on either the UHF and/or VHF systems.
The compact range provides a means to evaluate the radar cross section (RCS) of a wide variety of targets, but successful measurements are dependent on the type of target mounting used. This work is concerned with the mounting of targets to a metal ogival shaped pedestal, and in particular focuses on two forms of mounting techniques: the "soft" (non-metallic) and "hard" (metallic) mounting configurations. Each form is evaluated from both the mechanical and electromagnetic viewpoints, and the limitations associated with each type are examined. Additional concerns such as vector background subtraction and target-mount interactions are also examined, both analytically and through measurements performed in the ElectroScience Laboratory's Anechoic Chamber.
When performing antenna pattern measurements on far-field antenna test ranges or in anechoic chambers, one of the main problems concerning the pattern accuracy is range reflections. Previous works dealing with this have been limited to the one-dimensional case.
Harris Corporation has developed and introduced a miniature version of its shaped compact range called the Model 1603. This model is actually a scaled version of its very large compact ranges. The range features a three foot quiet zone in a very compact configuration, allowing the range to be set up in an anechoic chamber as small as a normal conference room. Performance features are equivalent to those achieved in large compact ranges by Harris, such as the Model 1640 with a forty foot quiet zone. Key features are very low quiet zone ripple, extremely low noise floor, and low cross polarization. This range can be used for the full gamut of precision RCS testing of small models or precision testing of antennas. It should also find wide application in production testing of these items. Harris can also provide turnkey compact range test systems based on the Model 1603 that use available radar instrumentation. Several of these miniature compact ranges have been delivered and are in use.
This paper discusses an anechoic chamber absorber evaluation which was conducted for the purpose of improving anechoic chamber and compact range performance through better absorber characterization. This study shows that performance of conventional absorber materials is dependent on selection of the material's shape, size and orientation with respect to the incident energy direction. This, demonstrates the importance of better characterization of the material. Nonhomogeneities in the material composition and physical structure were also found to significantly modify performance; in some cases even improving it. Also shown, is the need for improved evaluation techniques and procedures over conventionally used methods. An evaluation procedure using modern imaging techniques is presented. Several measured results for various absorber types and sizes are presented which show the usefulness of the evaluation technique and demonstrate relative performance characteristics for these materials. Measured reflectivity data on various absorber types, which consistently show better performance than levels specified by the vendors, are also presented.
Motorola's Government Electronics Group (GEG) located in Scottsdale, Arizona has recently completed construction of an indoor Antenna/RCS Test Facility. Motorola achieved quality construction of this new facility by utilizing local building contractors working under Motorola supervision through concept study, design, and construction phases. Motorola achieved quality chambers without turn-key costs. Three anechoic chambers and one shielded computer room were fabricated. The chambers sizes vary from 20'W x 16'H x 41'L to 36'W x 36'H x 72'L. All chambers were evaluated using techniques described by MIL-STD-285 (Attenuation measurements for enclosures, electromagnetic shielding, for electronic test purposes, Method of) and indicated shielding effectiveness, before absorber installation of -60 to -70 db at 400 MHz and -80 db from 1-18 GHz. Shielding effectiveness increased to -80 dB at 400 MHz and to greater than -115 dB from 1-18 GHz after absorber installation. In addition, the building contains eight individual security areas meeting government standards for security as prescribed in the Defense Intelligence Agency Manual (DIAM 50-3).
The indoor compact range has proven to be quite successful in measuring the radar cross section (RCS) of various targets. As the performance capabilities of the compact range have expanded, the use of larger, heavier, and more sophisticated targets has also expanded. Early target dimensions were limited by the size of the useful test area, as well as the capacities of the low RCS pedestal mount used. Today, our anechoic chamber has a large useful test area, thus the size and weight of targets dictate that a new method be employed in target handling and positioning, as well as target mounting to a low RCS pedestal. Work was recently completed here at the Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory to remodel our anechoic chamber to allow for the new generation of targets and the demands that they place on the anechoic chamber. This work included the addition of a one ton motorized underhung bridge crane to our anechoic chamber, the design and construction of an hydraulic assist to smoothly and precisely raise and lower the target for the final linkup of the support column and the receiving hole in the target, the design and installation of a one ton telescopic crane in the chamber annex to link with the main chamber crane, the design and installation of the necessary microwave treatments to minimize the impact of the remodeling on accurate RCS measurements, the development and installation of a sloping raised floor, the design and manufacture of a track guided rolling cart to shuttle operating personnel to and from the target area, the replacement of the existing radar absorbing material, the improvement of the ambient lighting in the chamber to facilitate film and video tape documentation, and the development of new target mounting schemes to ensure ease of handling as well as secure mounting for vector background subtraction.
Current demands for accurate low-level radar cross section (RCS) measurements require anechoic chambers and compact ranges to have extremely low background scattering levels. Such demands place difficult requirements on the entire chamber and warrant the need to predict and mathematically model chamber performance. Accurate modeling, prior to chamber construction, also aids in chamber performance optimization through improved chamber designs.
Near-field antenna measurements have many advantages, but also some limitations, which can be mainly attributed to the need for costly facilities or severe environmental effects. Although anechoic chambers are widely employed, absorbing material is very expensive and the whole construction becomes a considerable project, especially if it is required to accommodate various size antennas over wide frequency ranges.
This paper describes methods commonly used by anechoic chamber manufacturers to characterize chamber performance. Test procedures depend first on the purpose of the test; second on the purpose of the anechoic chamber and third on the amount of information required. Most anechoic chambers are built for a specific use. In order to prove its design, the test will be done accordingly. In most anechoic chambers one measures the reflectivity level because this is a measure for the accuracy on future measurements when the chamber is in operation. Anechoic chambers can vary from Antenna Pattern Test Chambers to Radar Cross Section Test Chambers, Electronic Warfare Simulation Chambers and Electro Magnetic Compatibility Test Chambers. Each type of chamber will have its specific evaluation technique. Some techniques can be done by the chamber user himself. Other methods need some special equipment that will or can only be used for that particular test method. Some customers want to do their own calibration on a regular basis. They can purchase this special equipment from the chamber manufacturer, if necessary. More complicated methods make use of computer controlled equipment. The data required can be taken in the chamber. This can be done relatively fast. All sorts of information about the chamber characteristics can be obtained in a later stage in a different format by use of the right software. This paper gives possible evaluation methods for different types of anechoic chambers. Detailed information about each method can be obtained from Emerson & Cuming.
In any type of electromagnetic measurements, the ideas of "precision and accuracy" and "low cost" tend to be mutually exclusive. At Scientific-Atlanta, for instance, production testing of antenna products is conducted in low cost miniature "anechoic chambers" which are fabricated in-house. These "chambers" are actually medium-sized to large (64-200 cubic feet) rectangular boxes with absorber attached to their walls. They are usually equipped with single axis positioners at one or both ends, and their usefulness is limited to the measurement of axial ratio on low gain small antennas.
As with all areas of production testing, it is desirable to be able to perform anechoic chamber testing of transmit antennas with a fully automatic test system. This paper has been prepared to describe how automating anechoic chamber testing of transmit antennas will yield data that is accurate, repeatable and cost-effective. The heart of the automated system is a Hewlett-Packard Model 8510 Network Analyzer controlled by a desktop computer.
A large, tapered anechoic chamber exists at the NASA Johnson Space Center (see Figure 1). This chamber has been used to test antennas mounted on full-size replicas of the Apollo moon lander. Also, antennas mounted on a scale model of the Space Shuttle have been tested in this facility. The chamber will have extensive utilization in the future for testing proposed Space Station antennas and other satellite antennas.
Conventional pattern measurements are difficult to apply when the aperture is very large (250 lambda or more), particularly in the case of a relatively fragile antenna structure intended for a space application. Near field techniques can offer a solution, but may need a relatively large R.F. enclosure and custom instrumentation. This paper examines various alternative approaches in the case of the 15 m planar array under development at CAL for Radarsat. Specifically, the techniques under consideration include planar probing, cylindrical probing, planar cylindrical probing, intermediate range spherical probing, and some special variants. It is shown that the fact that the Radarsat antenna generates shaped beams as opposed to pencil beams impacts the relative accuracies achieved by these techniques to a very significant extent. The data collection and processing time, the size of the anechoic chamber needed, and the instrumentation requirement are also important considerations.
Three measurements commonly used in the absorber industry include absorber testing in NRL arches, testing absorber in waveguides, and testing performance of anechoic chambers. These measurements are closely related. All are looking for the size of one E field vector in the presence of several other E fields of variable amplitudes and phases. The information is extracted from the behavior of the sum as a function of some physical position change or frequency change. Computer controlled, synthesized sources and receivers have had two effects on the way these measurements may be taken and interpreted. First, the data are now available as a series of numbers in a computer instead of a series of lines on a piece of paper. Precise and elegant processing is available to extract the information from the data. Secondly, since frequency changes are made rapidly with this type of instrumentation, and precise position changes are made slowly, the data may be taken for many frequencies at each physical position, this makes it possible to extract additional information from the observed data changes as a joint function of frequency and position. These changes are spread throughout the block of data for signal amplitude vs position and frequency.
This paper describes the mechanical as well as electrical measurement of doubly curved reflector antennas. The techniques developed for measurement of the new Canadian RAMP Primary Surveillance Radar antenna are described. Instead of a conventional full size template fixture to measure the antenna contour accuracy, an optical twin-theodolite method is used. The problems of the method are discussed and a new simplified analysis for calculating reflector error of doubly curved antennas is presented. Reflector errors are calculated and displayed concurrent with the actual measurements. The measurement of primary and secondary patterns for such antennas are described. Included are brief descriptions of the improved Andrew pattern test range and anechoic chamber facilities.
This paper presents data from facility evaluation tasks on current projects. The data were obtained on outdoor free-space pattern test facilities, and in anechoic chamber RCS test facilities.